I am recently being caught by the Veronicas. Their sound is really vulgar and very likely to be played in 109.

Listening: Justus Köhncke "Safe and Sound."

@sita_kimie the truth is revealed only after we actually listen to the sound.

@sita_kimie it is, I think, not the case in music because, even though we can sometimes figure out how a record sounds like from its jacket,

@sita_kimie However, while one seems to be able to improve his or her skill in discerning a good one from a bad one in the case of antique,

@sita_kimie I don't know much about an antique collecting, there might be a similarity b/w them.

@sita_kimie Just the result of a copious amount of tries and errors. If you listen to tons of music, you can find some good ones.

Listening: Black Box Recorder "England Made Me." It's a shame that they disbanded with only two albums left.

Listening: Dear Nora "We'll Have A Time."

Listening: Henry Cow "Unrest." Long live Canterbury.

@eien_kozo No, it's not usual manner at all. So, don't follow this way.

Listening: Belle & Sebastian "The Boy with the Arab Strap." In these days, I frequently listen to this album.

Applying the double negation rule and the commutation law, we got "P v Q." Voilà.

Recall that "P > Q" is defined by "~P V Q." So, "~Q > P" is gonna be "~~Q v P."

Let's think in the following way. "P unless Q" is equivalent to "If not Q, then P." The latter can be formalized as "~Q > P."

Today I found that some students have a difficulty in translating the English expression "P unless Q" to the formal one "P v Q."

Shoot. I've mistakenly bought a hardback version of a book. This is the second time that I made such a mistake.